Saturday, August 5, 2000
PARENTS IN THE U.S.A. NOT BELIEVING IN ADHD & RITALIN ARE HELD IN
CONTEMPT, GO TO JAIL, LOSE CUSTODY OF THEIR CHILDREN
Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD, 8/5/00 (may be used, reprinted with
attribution)
[Dr. Baughman:
Here is an Associated Press article about parents being court
ordered to give their child a psychiatric drug, against the family's
wishes. This is going on in family/divorce courts all over the country
where it is often the pivotal, divisive issue. Virtually always, the
court sides with the parent believing in ADHD as a disease, when it is
nothing of the sort, and in its essential treatment/drugging. The
parent doubting/resisting is deemed negligent and loses their share of
custody. Having testified in 15-20 such cases, virtually all on behalf
of such parents of divorce, I can attest that family court judges
invariably rule along the lines of reigning biological psychiatry
mythology, that is, they refuse to hear the legitimate science of the
matter. Hopefully, the science of the matterthat ADHD is not a proven
diseasethat the children are NORMAL, will be aired in higher court
cases in the near future.
]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ASSOCIATED PRESS – JULY 19, 2000
Court orders boy kept on Ritalin
ALBANY, N.Y., July 19 – An Albany couple facing child abuse
charges
for taking their son off Ritalin must continue medicating him.
That’s
the ruling from a family court judge in the case of Jill and
Michael
Carroll.
SOCIAL SERVICES CHARGES against Jill and Michael Carroll were
dropped
last week on the condition that they keep 7-year-old Kyle on
Ritalin,
Jill Carroll said. Social Service workers will visit the family
throughout the next year.
The judge also ruled that the couple could seek a second opinion
on whether Kyle needs Ritalin. Carroll said a pediatrician and a
psychologist agreed that the medication be continued. However, if
another pediatrician examines Kyle and disagrees, the Carrolls could
appeal.
[Dr. Baughman-
it is well-nigh impossible to find a physician of any kind today
that does not believe in ADHD and its essential treatment with
Ritalin. It often constitutes a third, a half, or more of pediatric or
family practices; 75% of child psychiatry practices. With no proof, in
20 years, that it is a diseasechildren with it, other than NORMAL, it
has become the standard of practice. Physicians like myself, who
would invoke science, are pointed to as out of the mainstream.
Psychologists making determinations as to the presence or absence of
disease and the appropriateness of medication, are guilty of practicing
medicine without a license. But then school teachers, special
educators, therapists, principals, school teams and departments of
social services, routinely practice medicine without a license.
]
The controversy began last year when an official from the
Berne-Knox-Westerlo School District that the boy attended
contacted
Albany County’s Department of Social Services, complaining that
the
parents wanted to stop giving Kyle the drug prescribed for
hyperactivity and attention deficit disorder.
The Carrolls argued the Ritalin interfered with their son’s
appetite and sleep.
© 2000 Associated Press.
http://www.msnbc.com/local/WNYT/43314.asp?0na=2269190c
[Dr. Baughman-
these are real, deleterious, short-term side effects of an
addictive, dangerous, sometimes deadly drug. Had the Carrolls
somewhere read a scientific assessment of ADHDthat, as F.X. Castellanos
stated in the January, 2000, Readers Digest: "Incontrovertible evidence
is still lacking
In time Im confident well confirm the case for
organic causes."
Dr. Castellanos, Dr. Jensen, Dr. Swanson, Dr. Hyman, Dr. Zametkin, Dr.
Rapoport (all purveyors of ADHD as a disease, all of the National
Institute of Mental Health), its been 20 years, since ADD/ADHD was
invented for the 1980, DSM-III20 years, and 6 million children on
addictive (Schedule II), dangerous, sometimes deadly, drugs, and still
no proof that ADHD is a disease, that the children are other than
NORMAL. Were the Carrolls told by the court or by any other
ADHD/Ritalin practitioner, on there way from their sons school, to
court, what Dr. Castellanos has told us about ADHDthat its existence
is yet to be proven. Perhap, too, the Carrolls saw news of the clearly
Ritalin-caused cardiac death of 14 year old Matthew Smith of Clawson,
Michigan.
It would be understandable if a court held parents in contemptnegligent
were they to refuse to give insulin to a severely ill, diabetic child,
or anti-siezure drugs to a child having frequent, uncontrolled,
epileptic siezures. It would be understandable too, if the child had
lost blood in an auto accident or a complicated operation and needed
blood by transfusion to save the childs lifea transfusion, the parents
forbade. But today, in the US, bastion of freedom, justice, and
democracy, there are hundreds of thousands or a few million cases in the
family courts of the nation in which parents, like Jill and Michael
Carroll are being told that the disease that must, by order of the
court, be pharmacologically treated, is ADD/ADHD, not a disease at all,
but an arbitrarily constituted group of behaviors, all of them normal,
all of them regularly encountered in entirely normal schoolchildren,
mostly boys. Mind you, the country at large has been lead, contrary to
science, to believe that ADHD is a disease with a disease-confirming
physical/chemical abnormality in the child. But try as they might to
find that disease, that chemical imbalance, they cannotand they have
been hunting for it for 20 years. To understand why ADHD has not been
validated as a disease (a physical abnormality within the person),
never will be, and why not a single psychiatric disorder/ disease has
been validated by the finding of a diagnosable abnormality within the
person, see my web-site article HISTORY OF THE FRAUD OF BIOLOGICAL
PSYCHIATRY.
Knowing full-well, that ADHD is not a disease, that children said to
have it are NORMAL, one would think, and trust, that the leadership of
US psychiatry, pediatrics and medicine would stop calling it a disease
and stop telling the public, educators, child protective services,
legislators, judges, etc. that it is a disease.. But they do not. The
ADHD industry is hot! Every NORMAL child is a potential patientno
exams, no objective findings necessary. And it isnt just school kids
anymore. Diagnosing and drugging from the crib to kindergarten is a
promising new sector of this multibillion-dollar marketplace, as all
semblance of ethics appears to have faded from the scene. These infant,
toddlers and preschoolers that are being drugged for fraudulent
diseases that cannot even be validated in schoolchildren, are also
NORMALNORMAL, that is until these drugs, doing God-only knows what
damage to these young brains and bodies, begins coursing through their
every system.
But it seems to me the ultimate in something or other when judges,
without benefit of scientific proofbeholden only to the pseudoscience
and fraud of ADHD, tell sensible, doubting parents that (1) they must
accept the ADHD label for their child and (2) they must give the Ritalin
or other amphetamineregardless of whether of not the parent/parents,
exercising their common-sense, suspect, correctly, that it is a fraud
and that the drugs are addictive and dangerous and are for naught.
My experience testifying for parents, like the Carrolls, has been almost
uniformly disappointing. Local, family court judges, accept the
biological psychiatry model from the psychiatrists and psychologists who
practice it and help the court immeasurably, dispose of otherwise
sticky, complex, wrenching, human dilemmas. None of them want to hear
that the biological psychiatry that they practice, so neatly, so
expeditiouslya chemical imbalancea chemical balancer, is a sham, a
fraud, a perversion of science and medicine and now--of politics and the
law.
ADHDa serious, life threatening, endangering, disease that must be
treated or else--
hardly! The or else, is that without pseudo-scientific, invented
illusions of diseases, biological psychiatry and their controlling
partner, the pharmaceutical industry would be out the $ 5 billion dollar
sector that is psychopharmacologythe drugging of unfortunate, poor,
deprived, down-trodden, troubled, but NORMAL human beings when such
drugging that leaves their miserable lifes-situation untouched, does
not a single thing to set them on a better lifes-course. In fact what
it does, deceiving them, having them believe they have a disease that
does not exist, leaves them without a true picture of their own lifes
course, unprepared to help themselves. Does the pill tell them? Do two
pills? Five? Let it be understood that this is all they get from
psychiatry with its biological paradigm, which, it just so happens,
coincides with their seamless, but dependent relationship with the
pharmaceutical industry.
On February 4, 2000, I wrote to Stephen E. Hyman, MD, Director, of
the
National Institute of Mental Health. That letter, dealing,
specifically, with the fact that parents all over the country are being
deceived as to the true nature of ADHD and then coerced, even legally
and judicially, to accept, unquestioningly, both diagnosis and treatment
is now appended in its entirety.
Stephen E. Hyman, MD, Director February 4, 2000 (mailed 2/4) National Institute of Mental Health 5600 Fishers Lane, Room #18C-17 Rockville, MD 20857 Dear Dr. Hyman, The American people have been left to get a statement of the true nature of ADHD fromof all placesthe Readers Digest (January 2000, p. 158). While the name of John Pekkanens article is Making Sense of Ritalin, the primary questionwhether ADHD exists, at all, is asked and answered. On page 160 we read: "Some observers suggest that ADHD is little more than a stigmatizing tag put on normal kids who are simply distracted or act up in school. Others insist that ADHD is a very real and even underdiagnosed medical disorderand one that may require drug treatment." Following much discussion of biological research and theory, Pekkanen writes: "Incontrovertible evidence is still lacking. But many researchers engaged in scientific studies of ADHD widely accept that it is a valid medical condition." Here we have itthe very latest as to efforts to validate ADHD as a brain disease, an abnormality within the child (and the adults)Castellanos saying: "In time Im confident well confirm the case for organic causes." What this means, as you, I, and Dr. Castellanos understand with perfect clarity--even if the public remains confused and deceived on this point is that not a single one of the 5-6 million children in the US labeled "ADHD" bears objective evidence of a physical or chemical abnormality establishing that they are diseasedother than normal. And, "No!" it is not O.K. to drug children because you believe they will be proved at some time in the future to have a disease. Nothing has changed since 1998! Nothing has changed since 1980 when ADD was invented for inclusion in the American Psychiatric Associations DSM-III! On May 13, 1998, Dr. Castellanos (NIMH) wrote to me (a duplicate of his signed letter to me can be seen on my web site (http://home.att.net/~fred-alden/) " I have noted your critiques of the diagnostic validity of ADHD. I agree that we have not yet met the burden of demonstrating the specific pathophysiology that we believe underlies this condition. However, my colleagues and I are certainly motivated by the belief that it will be possible in the near future to do so." And this from NIMH, University of California, Irvine, researcher, James Swanson. Swanson, who was the featured speaker on ADHD at a meeting I was attending in San Diego, that of the American Society for Adolescent Psychiatry, March 5-8, 1998. Swanson (from the tape recording of the session): "I would like to have an objective diagnosis for the disorder (ADHD). Right now psychiatric diagnosis is completely subjective We would like to have biological testsa dream of psychiatry for many years I think we will validate it." And so it was with ADHD in 1998: Swanson thinks "we will validate it!" Meanwhile, Castellanos and his colleagues are " motivated by the belief that it will be possible in the near future to do so." So it is in January, 2000, as well. There is never a biological proof in psychiatry. There is never validation of a psychiatric "disorder" as a "disease". We all knowyou, Dr. Hyman, Dr. Castellanos, Dr. Swanson and myself--that the search and the research for ADHD will go forward. We also know that it will be never-ending for the simple, if unimaginable, reason that there is no abnormality, the children are normal, and that no matter what technology you apply, the results will always come up short. But the search and the research will be to keep alive visions and illusions of real diseases in psychiatry and of "chemical imbalances" that must (even if by force) be treated with "chemical balancers" those manufactured by psychiatrys controlling partner, the all-powerful, infinitely wealthy (able to buy almost anything), world-wide, pharmaceutical industry. Another issue that got candid treatment in the Pekkanen article was that of the brain atrophy (shrinkage, shriveling) in children with ADHD and on amphetaminesalways on amphetamines: "Castellanos and his group found three areas of the brain to be significantly smaller in ADHD kids than in normal children this suggests that ADHD may arise from abnormalities in these parts of the brain." In the interests of keeping illusions of "diseases" and "treatments" alive, Dr. Castellanos and Dr. Jay Giedd, an NIMH associate of his, also interviewed by Pekkanen, conveniently failed to mention the vast majority of the ADHD subjects93 percentin their research, were on amphetamine, stimulant "therapy" and that this was the only physical variablethe only known, physical difference between the ADHD subjects and the normal control individuals. Pekkanen wrote of this as a mere possibility; the ramblings of disgruntled "critics": "Some critics claim that such brain differences in ADHD children might actually be caused by Ritalinmeaning these smaller areas of the brain could be the result of the stimulant treatment." You know, Dr. Hyman, as surely as Dr. Castellanos, Dr. Giedd, myself, and all involved in such research, that this is the only plausible conclusionthat Ritalin itself, known to be brain-damaging, encephalopathic, is the likely cause of the brain atrophy (shrinkage, shriveling). In that ADHD has never been validated as a disease or medical syndrome, the only physical variable, i.e., factor, operative in the ADHD group, not operative in the control group, is the Ritalin/stimulant treatment in the former (ADHD) but not in the latter (controls). In what amounts to a confession that all of the brain scanning research to datethat which shows the 10 percent (on average) brain atrophy, has always compared treated ADHD subjects to normal controls, we read: "To address this (the possibility that the brain atrophy is drug-induced), Castellanos has now embarked on another study, imaging the brains of ADHD youngsters who have not been treated with drugs." It is not just the public, but the judiciary and legislature, as well, that have been roundly deceived. The notion that ADHD is an actual disease and that Ritalin/stimulant therapy is essential, proven, therapy prevails in juvenile and family courts across the country. At this very time I am physician-advisor to 12 parents-of-divorce, who have been told by family court judges that ADHD is an actual disease for which they must, by court order, administer Ritalin/stimulant and other psychotropic medication. Resisting or failing to cooperate they have been threatened with or have already lost a portion of their custody rights. There can be no doubt that hundreds of thousands to a few million of such cases have been, and are, being adjudicated, across the country. Nor can there be any doubt that the parents of virtually all of the 5-6 million "diagnosed", "treated" cases across the country labor under the mistaken notion that ADHD actually exists and that it is a bona fide disease. Without a doubt, the NIMH has been at the forefront of this deception, its "experts" and "researchers" regularly proclaiming this to be the fact of the matter when there is no proof or science in hand. In 1996, writing in the journal of the PTA, Ellen Schiller of the US Department of Education, Peter Jensen, of the NIMH, and James Swanson proclaimed: "Once parents and teachers recognize that children with ADD are not lazy or bad, but have a biological disorder, they can stop blaming themselves or their children and take appropriate steps to prevent a pattern of failure." This is not a legitimate medical endeavor. It is a crime of monstrous proportions against the people and the youth of the whole of the US and now, increasingly in Canada, and throughout the developed countries of the world, carried forth by the same cadre of ADHD "researchers" and "experts" for the same all-controlling pharmaceutical industry. Knowing as you do, the wholly unproven, fraudulent, nature of ADHDrepresented as a disease, the NIH/NIMH should state, plainly, honestly, and scientifically (at long last): "There is no confirmatory physical or chemical abnormality in ADHD. It is not a disease the children (adults, too) are normal." In addition, the NIH/NIMH should state: "It is highly probable that the brain atrophy reported in ADHD subjects is due, not to ADHD (never validated as a disease) but to Ritalin and the other amphetamines which the majority of the ADHD research subjects were taking." NIMH researchers have deemed the amount of atrophy in such studies to be "significant" but have blamed it on non-existent ADHD. Given the magnitude of the Ritalin/stimulant epidemic, the NIH/NIMH should also call a press conference, forthwith, to announce the prominent addition of these two statements to your web site as well as to an NIH/NIMH informational phone line. In the December 22/29, 1999 Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA. 1999;282:2290], we find the musings of heads of the constituent institutes of the National Institutes of Health, as to what the future portends for their disciplines. Targeting the year 2020, you, Dr. Hyman, as Director of the NIMH state, remarkably enough: By 2020 it will be a truth, obvious to all, that mental illnesses are brain diseases that result from complex gene-environment interactions. We will be reaping the therapeutic benefits that accrue from the discovery of risk genes for autism, schizophrenia, manic depressive illness, and other serious mental disorders. We will also routinely analyze real-time movies of brain activity derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging, optical imaging, or their successor technologies, working together with magnetoencephalography or its successor technology. In these movies, we will see the activity of distributed neural circuits during diverse examples of normal cognition and emotion; we will see how things go wrong in mental illness; and we will see normalization with our improved treatments. Amazingly, not a single mental, emotional or behavioral disorder has been validated as a disease, a medical syndrome , a phenotype or genotype with a confirmatory physical or chemical abnormality or marker within the brain. Such is the totality of the deception. And yet the NIMH and all in academic psychiatry and mental health regularly represent all of the “serious mental disorders” as though they were, and would have the public, the legislature, and the judiciary believe that they are. Further, with not a one having so much as a physical marker and any prospect that any technology will validate a one as a disease, you pledge the application, from decade to decade, of every evolving technology to confirm, your belief, and psychiatrys , that “mental illnesses are brain diseases”. Observe your use of the term “normalization” establishing, etymologically at least, that those with mental illnesses are abnormal. Lending “neuro-biologic” credence to “depression” where there is none, and demonstrating the complicity of neurology with the “biological” psychiatry, and thus the psychiatry/pharmaceutical cartel, Gerald D. Fischbach, MD, Director, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, states: Neurodegeneration is a ubiquitous phenomenon that occurs in many brain diseases, not only in the classic neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson disease, Alzheimer disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurodegenerative disorders also contribute significantly to epilepsy, multiple sclerosis and even depression. Director Fischbach, of the NINDS, has yet to respond to my letter (January 5, 2000) asking for proof that depression is anything “neurodegenerative” or anything abnormal, or a disease at all. These are seductive visions and illusions of disease that you weave. It is no wonder that you have the people of NAMI, Tipper Gore, General McCaffrey, victims themselves with emotional problems and pains, and indeed, the whole country, believing in psychiatric “diseases” and “chemical imbalances”, where none exist. Few could imagine such a deception. One more thing, Dr. Hyman. Why was my invited testimony at the November16-18, 1998, NIH Consensus Conference on ADHD, expunged from the final, for sale to the public, version of the Conference videotape? That I testified that “ADHD is a total, 100 percent fraud” is beside the point. No one present challenged or rebutted my characterization. You should resign, Sir, and allow the appointment of someone who will have the independence necessary to follow what science and the welfare of children dictate, and to duly publicize and disseminate the two points above, those about (1) the lack of validity of ADHD as a disease, an abnormality, and (2) that Ritalin/amphetamine/stimulant therapy (such as is now “standard” or “court-ordered” treatment in 5-6 million US children), is the probable cause of the “significant” brain atrophy in normal children (ADHD having been shown to be non-existent). In the meantime, I will urge attorneys, judges and state and national legislators and victimized citizens to call your office (301-496-4319) Also, they can give you Dr. Hymans phone number and ask for a “Yes!” or “No!” answer to the question, “Is ADHD a proven, bona fide disease with a demonstrable, confirmatory, physical or chemical abnormality within my childany childany adult?” The role of the NIH and NIMH in so deceiving the public about the essential nature of ADHD, and all psychological and emotional pains and problems, should be the subject of immediate Congressional, Senatorial, and White House investigations. Finally, Secretary Richard Riley of the US Department of Education should be told of the true status of ADHD and should be advised to suspend all mention, diagnosis, and practice of so-called ADHD, throughout US public schools, much as was suggested by the November 11, 1999 resolution of the Colorado State Board of Education. Truly yours, Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD 1303 Hidden Mountain Drive El Cajon, CA 92019 cc Tipper Gore cc General McCaffrey cc Secretary, DHHS Donna Shalala cc Attorney General Janet Reno cc President William J. Clinton cc Vice President Al Gore cc Senator John McCain cc Bill Bradley cc Governor George W. Bush cc Congressman Chris Shays cc Senator William Frist cc Congressman Randy Cunningham cc Colorado State Board of Education cc Penn Pfiffner, Representative, Colorado State Legislature cc George F. Will
Wayne S. Fenton, MD wrote to me for Dr. Hyman on 2/28/2000, offering no
proof that ADHD is a disease of the brain or body, i.e., that children
with it are other than NORMAL. Nor did he provide an explanation for
the regular representations by the NIMH, NIMH personnel, organized
psychiatry, and Children and Adults with Attention Deficit
DisordersCHADD, that ADHD is a disease, an abnormality, a chemical
imbalance within the brain of the child (thus making patients of
NORMAL children). The people of the U.S. did not make this up on their
own.
Wherever I testify on the behalf of parents whose civil rights are being
violated to enforce the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric
diseases that are not diseases at all, I testify UNDER PENALTY OF
PERJURY that nowhere in the scientific record is their proof that ADHD
(or any psychiatric condition) is a disease with an demonstrable,
diagnosable abnormality within the patient. I urge concerned citizens
to write to Dr. Stephen Hyman, Director, NIMH, or to cutting edge ADHD
researcher, F. Xavier Castellanos, MD, also at the NIMH and ask them the
"Is it a diseaseyes or no? question and demand from them the
specific article identified, as is done in science, starting with the
names (s) of the authors, name of the article, name of the journal,
date, volume and page number. If you, like the Carrolls and countless
others are involved in a legal battle, ask themHyman or Castellanos to
designate that their reply, is rendered as the truth, UNDER THE PENALTY
OF PERJURY!