greg wrote: This pretty much seals the deal on public school. The flap about the pledge of allegiance is a bad decision meant to take away the lime light from the real issue of invasion of privacy. The pledge thing will be overturned, this will not. Since when do the "interests of the schools" supercede a persons right to privacy? Even more absurd is that this is limited to students enrolled in "after-school" programs. First of all, drug abusers don't participate in after school programs. Secondly, an after school program is just that... AFTER school! What gives them the right to test these kids just because they're in an after school program. What does that have to do with what happens "in school"? This only validates my conspiracy theory. Who do you think this is really meant to benefit? Who makes the millions of drug test kits that will be needed? Ahh, now were getting somewhere. Big Pharma, Big Bro, and the Brave New Schools. It makes me want to puke. Public schools are no longer fit for the public.The only good thing I have seen come out of this is greater support for the voucher system, which the Supreme Court ruled in favor of. Now if we could just get it past those pesky teacher union lobbyist in California who support Big Pharma (good luck), we might at least be able to teach our children ourselves. Link to web site: www.rense.com/general26/supremecourtoksmandatory.htm . This ruling is also available on foxnews.com. Greg
|