Posted by



 Andrew Belanger wrote:

     Thank you! I am a student at University of Hawaii doing research
 for a project on client/patient advocacy. I agree with the evidence
 that conclusively proves the fraudulent nature of many


[Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
Not
many--all/every psychiatric diagnosis/condition. Not a one is a
disease, having, as it must, an abnormality on physical exam or some
test/technology, that all can see-objective. That so many, almost
all, believe otherwise is tribute to the psych-pharm sham biologic
research and propaganda alone. Organized neurology knows of the
fraud but says nothing because they too, like all of medical
academia, are owned and operated by big pharma]


 a diagnosis owing
 to the economic necessity of the institution. This is an unpopular view
 in my profession


[Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
It is a matter of science, not popularity, and by
now they all make their livings making mental health patients of
normals and drugging them]


 .  I am currently working as an aide in  our local
 behavioral health unit and studying to become a psych RN. My associates
 are rejecting the findings in the course of my project


[Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
It is
they--those saying these are diseases, those who rx. drug who must
present proof of the abnormality/disease]


 . It is
 disheartening, to say the least, that the motivation of many medical
 professionals has been altered by this greed which leads to
 inappropriate care and treatment. I found your essay on ADD revealing
 and relevant.

 May I please use portions of the ADD essay to help the impact of
 my report?


[Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
Yes. Also use

Letter to California Medical Board
]


 I will properly credit your work with quotations and
 footnotes. If you wish I would be happy to send you a copy of the
 finished product


[Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD:
Please do] .


                           Regards,

                      Andy Belanger



Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)