THE
By
On May, 13, 1998, Castellanos
This was one of but a few
On October 10, 2002, this same
Under “Context,” they write:
The phrase, “Without accounting
For more “context” regarding ADHD
Hynd, et al [4] (1991), using MRI,
Giedd, et al. [5] (1994), using
Castellanos [6] (1994), wrote:
The majority of these patients
d-amphetamine (Dexedrine).
Lyoo, et al, [7] (1996), studied
Castellanos et al [8] (1996), took magnetic resonance images
However, if you failed to read
If the this was the first “proof”
In 1997 Filipek, et al [9], undertook volumetric MRI analysis “To test
Berquin , et al. [10]
Mostofsky [11] (1999): Brain abnormality linked to ADHD, April 20,
Semrud-Clikeman
These
Semrud-Clikeman
THE ADHD CONSENSUS CONFERENCE
In
“The convergence of findings
Swanson, presenting at the
Nor did Swanson leave any doubt
Baughman, an invited presenter,
Audience: “ooh, wow!”
Swanson: “Well, that’s a hypothesis.
Opening the November 16-18, 1998,
Carey, reporting on “Is ADHD a
Degrandpre, commenting on the Report
Failing to prove that ADHD is a
Baughman testified: “Without an
Given Carey’s testimony, that ADHD
“ …we do not have an
I specify “final statement of
In a Readers Digest interview in January, 2000 [15], it was
Which study is that?
Here again Castellanos cites the need to do a study of
In order to know if the brains of
Actually, the answer to the
Swanson’s saying this means
Swanson’s saying this also means
BIBLIOGRAPHY
2.
|
Leave a Reply